Road to Socialism: Racist Panel or Stupid Masses?

I was going to write about the so-called “racist” cartoon in the news, but stumbled upon a blog with much the same viewpoint I had. The cartoon is not racist because the stimulus package was put together by mostly white people.

The meaning I get from the cartoon is this: people compared George Walker Bush to an ape because the laws that were passed during his tenure were idiotic to the average American, and because he played a good moron. Let us not forget, though, that the laws were passed by Congress, and that for the last part of his presidency the Congress was mostly Democratic. Barack Obama and John McCain voted for the expanded use of warrentless breaking and entering, a direct violation of our explicitly-stated Constitutional freedom from search without evidence. Read it. It is very clear.

The point is that seemingly primitive people are in control, even after Savior Obama’s victory in the election and the strengthening of the Democratic control of Congress. The truth is, though, that both parties are and have been working to bring Nazi ideals to our great Union, strengthening the federal government, and ever-growing the police state and military-industrial-financial complex.

We have been propagandized to believe we need the government to control our healthcare. Ask someone who is on Medicare or Medicaid if you want the feds in charge of your medical decisions. Yet, soon enough, the people in office will make another attempt to socialize the healthcare system.

We have been misled to believe that humans, and not the sun cycle, are responsible for the warming trend. The truth is that changes in carbon dioxide levels follow changes in temperature. CO2 levels have been higher than they are now. And other planets in the solar system are heating up. I highly doubt your SUV is sending smog to Saturn. Yet soon you will be taxed on having too many children and by your “carbon footprint”, a brilliant propaganda term, coined in the style of the originator of public relations and nephew of Freud, Edward Bernays. Remember that China’s one-child policy started as a tax on multiple children. Today Hillary Clinton said we need stronger relations with China.

Anyway, the point is that the status quo has to go. Republi-crat-ism is a dog-and-pony show, designed to give you the illusion of choice. The masses are deluded into beliving that they are making weighty decisions that will change the course of our Union’s future. If they read their Constitution, they’d realize that the federal government isn’t supposed to have power to do anything they are doing, and they’ve outsourced one of their duties to the private Federal Reserve. At the same time they are talking about nationalizing banks, and have already done so. However, what they mean by nationalization is giving control over to the Federal Reserve and the FDIC, both private corporations. They are theiving from the rich to give to the richer, screwing you in the process. They are corrupt and they are increasing their power daily.

If you want to return the Union to its rightful status, if you want to regain sovereignty for your State and your Person, if you want your rights to life, liberty, and property, join in the movement to restate your sovereignty. New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and other states have introduced resolutions to remind the federal government of their constitutional responsiblities and limits. Their statutes (rules of society that have the “force of law”, but which are therefore not laws) are null and void. They have no power. 3 letter organizations are illegal. Most federal “law” is illegal. They only have these powers because you’ve been led to believe, over a multi-generational campaign, to believe that they can do these things.

Now they are going to play the proverbial race card. Attorney General Eric Holder stated that Americans are “cowards” for not discussing racial issues. This is the same attorney who argued for the Washington D.C. complete gun ban in front of the Supreme Court in the Heller case. Now there is outcry of this cartoon, which is obviously not targetted toward Obama, being racist. Expect more similar propaganda in the future. Equal rights movements, sparked by the international bankers, will be the vehicle to socialism. Mark my words. FEMA internment camps are being built. Forced labor, here I come.

An Open Letter to Linda S. Bolon

Following is a letter I wrote to Ohio House Representative Linda S. Bolon (D), District 1.

I urge you, as a representative of the People of this great State of Ohio, to read New Hampshire House Resolution HCR 0006, available at <a title=”states rights” href=”http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html&#8221; target=”_blank”>http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html</a&gt;

The co-sponsors of this resolution in New Hampshire are true American patriots, acting to protect the People of their State from the out-of-control Federal government which was formed to protect the same. The Constitution, which was ratified by the several States, and accepted by our State, explicitly states that any power not specifically delegated to the Federal government belongs to the States or the People. Nearly all acts of Congress in our lifetimes have been unconstitutional acts, seeking to take liberty from the States and the People. The constitution is very straightforward and does not allow for the statutes and laws, executive orders, and judicial orders so often passed into “law” by the Federal government. All of these “laws” are null and void, according to the Constitution for the United States.

We have long forgotten, as a People, what exactly the Constitution means, and what “State” means, and who is supposed to have the power in this Union. We act as though we are one nation, which is absolutely false. We are a Union of fifty nations, fifty States, bound together by certain, enumerated principles, spelled out specifically in the Constitution for the United States. We have for too long allowed the Federal government to exercise power over the individual States and it is high time this was put to an end.

I call on you to act swiftly in introducing a similar resolution in the Ohio House of Representatives. It is your duty as a representative of the People of this great State to protect our liberties and those of our State.

Sincerely,
Jeremy D Forsythe
Salem, Ohio

Piercing Cats Nets Cruelty Charges

Read this article.

Am I dreaming? Animal cruelty charges for piercing cats and removing their tails?

Now, don’t get me wrong, I think it’s absolutely stupid to pierce your cat or make its tail fall off. Stupid. But…

Tails are removed from dogs ALL THE TIME. How is this any different? How is piercing “cruel” but spaying and neutering aren’t? How is sticking a needle through a cat’s ear cruel, but declawing (cutting off it’s first joint, like amputating part of your finger) isn’t? I think that putting a ring in a cats ear is MUCH more humane than cutting its genitals off, although this practice is encouraged by the same authorities who have charged these folks.

Do a search for pictures of declawing surgery and then tell me that piercing is cruel.

Gender Confusion and the Degradation of the Family Unit in Modern Man

In nature, things are simple – propagate, propagate, propagate. Each species has a unique way in which this is carried out. Some animals have intercourse while in other species the male fertilizes eggs outside the female’s body. In some species the young are carried in a pouch while plants have no contact with their offspring. These gender roles are biologically programmed into each species. It is their strongest desire to fulfill their mission. That is what makes them happy. Humans are no different than other living creatures. It is no coincidence that love, sex, and parenthood are such strong, good feelings. The human tragedy is that we’ve developed the ability to make ourselves miserable.

For millennia humans performed their innately programmed roles – males provided stability and security, females provided love and nurturing. Men have traditionally been the hunters, soldiers, and bread-winners. Females have always taken care of the nest and the family. Men taught the children strength, pride, and motivation, and women taught love, humility, and loyalty.

These roles have been consistent throughout the world for our whole history until the 20th century. In our utter lack of insight and tendency to prove Murphy’s Law true, the Western world began a grand experiment in the 1900s to evolve the human being by “freeing” us from our tyrannically-imposed gender roles.

It cannot be refuted that there were gender-specific rules which were unfair. Women’s suffrage and their slow but much-improved acceptance into the workplace have been positive strides toward equal treatment. But it is also unfair to claim we have given our young ladies a choice to stay at home or pursue a career and on the other hand so strongly emphasize a career that they feel being a homemaker is equivalent to failure.

It is also unfair to our young men that women are bombarded with ideas like: “men should be sensitive and express their feelings”. Women are taught, through movies, television, and teen magazines, to desire men who behave outside their traditional gender role. Men, in their desire for women, began capitulating, cheered on by being immersed in our own evolved-human movement. I aver that this is the direct cause of the increased divorce and infidelity rates in the West.

Women don’t want soft, sensitive men. Women want stability and security. They want to be taken care of and to not have to worry about danger or where the next meal is coming from. When a woman comes to cry on a man’s shoulder, she expects him to be her rock. He should not have tears rolling down his cheek, whimpering like a baby. When the bills come due, she wants money in the bank, and at dinner there should be food to put on the table. Fulfilling these duties for her will make a woman feel good. She’s programmed that way.

The reverse is also true – women can make men happiest by providing the things nature makes them desire: love, nurturing, loyalty, support, and family cohesion. A man needs a woman who will cheer him on, and when he comes home from the war he wants his woman to still be there for him. He wants love and support to keep him motivated and proud. These are the things that make him happy.

This experiment we’ve undertaken has taught us to stop behaving in ways that make our mates feel at peace. Instead of giving them what they want most, we’ve begun hijacking their duties – the things they’re designed to be best at – and we’re forcing them to take on our roles. We’re miserable in this environment, as a culture, and it shows. Over half of all marriages in America end in divorce. This is exactly what one would expect if we all stop trying to meet the needs of our significant others.

What we need is a world where everybody has a choice to fulfill any role they wish, but what is stressed is that each individual choose the role that will bring them the most happiness in life. There are factors that could make certain individuals happier in different roles, but in general men are happiest when they act like men, and women when they act like women. We seem to have forgotten this simple fact.

Budget of the United States Government

Discretionary Spending by Agency (in dollars)

Agency	FY 2007 (law)	FY 2008 (request)
Department of Agriculture	19,600,000,000	20,200,000,000
Department of Commerce	5,600,000,000	6,600,000,000
Department of Defense	429,600,000,000	481,400,000,000
Department of Education	56,000,000,000	56,000,000,000
Department of Energy	22,800,000,000	24,300,000,000
Department of Health & Human Services	69,100,000,000	69,300,000,000
Department of Homeland Security	32,000,000,000	34,300,000,000
Department of Housing & Urban Development	34,700,000,000	35,200,000,000
Department of Interior	10,300,000,000	10,600,000,000
Department of Justice	19,400,000,000	20,200,000,000
Department of Labor	11,700,000,000	10,600,000,000
Department of State, et al	28,700,000,000	35,000,000,000
Department of Transportation	10,700,000,000	12,100,000,000
Department of Treasury	11,400,000,000	12,100,000,000
Department of Veterans Affairs	33,200,000,000	39,400,000,000
Army Corps of Engineers	4,700,000,000	4,900,000,000
Environmental Protection Agency	7,500,000,000	7,200,000,000
Executive Office of the President	300,000,000	300,000,000
Judicial Branch	5,300,000,000	6,100,000,000
Legislative Branch	3,700,000,000	4,400,000,000
NASA	16,200,000,000	17,300,000,000
National Science Foundation	5,600,000,000	6,400,000,000
Small Business Administration	400,000,000	500,000,000
Social Security Administration	7,600,000,000	7,900,000,000
Other Agencies	6,500,000,000	7,500,000,000
Total Discretionary Spending	852,800,000,000	929,800,000,000

Is America Headed for a Second Revolution?

In an interview with LewRockwell.com, Gerald Celente predicted $2,000 an ounce gold, a depression “the likes of which no one has ever seen before”, and a second American Revolution. Visit LewRockwell.com or click here to listen to the complete interview. Highlights appear below. Gerald has successfully predicted Black Monday, the fall of the Soviet Union, the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, and the 2007-present subprime mortgage crisis.

GERALD CELENTE: So We’re looking at unemployment numbers that are going up to around 25%, to rival the Great Depression. And in many ways this coming depression is going to be much worse, because back then.. most people didn’t own homes, so they weren’t carrying insurance or paying property taxes. There was no such thing as a home equity loan and people didn’t have credit cards. So they weren’t burdened with over $14 trillion of debt. And back then we had budget surpluses and trade surpluses and now we have major deficits in each. $700 billion a year trade, $11.5 trillion total budget, and close to $1 trillion coming online this year, another deficit.

GC: So yeah, people are going to be in very dire straits. All these people that are getting fired, all these stores that are closing – Circuit City going bankrupt, KB Stores, Steve and Barry’s, Linens n Things – we’re seeing closings – Starbucks, Office Depot, the other day, announced 142 stores. Number one, where are these people that are being fired or laid off, where are they going to find jobs? And number two, who’s going to take all these vacant retail spaces and commercial spaces that are going to be left empty? The answer to both of those questions is nobody… So we’re looking at a melt-down, a catastrophe, the likes of which no one has ever seen before.

GC: To watch grown men grovel is a disgusting spectacle. And that’s all they do, when you’re in government. That’s how people get to the top – they suck their way to the top. And when they’re big enough, as they’re bringing back all these failures from the Clinton administration, they fail their way to the top.

On what you should keep in mind in the near future:

GC: Well what I would suggest they do is they don’t spend a dime that they don’t have, and also realize that their dollar might be worth dimes in the coming years because they’re creating a situation for hyperinflation, so we’re looking at gold to go to probably $2,000 an ounce.

LEW ROCKWELL: And the dollar plummeting?

GC: Yeah if they keep printing money, you’re creating hyperinflation, so you have deflation of product commodities where you have inflationary pressures on worthless currencies. They did it in the Weimar Republic, they’re doing it in Zimbabwe, and they’re going to do it again. Because that’s Obama’s only solution, is to create 2.5 million jobs by creating job work projects. So he’s printing more money, it’s not going to solve anything.

GC: The people that have caused the problem are now running the show… Wall Street is running Washington.

LR: Big banks got the government to create the Federal Reserve system for them, so now they’re reaping the rewards and they’re killing the rest of us…

GC: That’s exactly what’s going on. The too-big-to-fail are being saved, and the too-small-to-save are being drowned.

LR: Gerald, are we going to see riots in this country? Are we going to see tax revolts, as happened in the Great Depression?

GC: Yes, absolutely, we’re going to see revolution, and we expect it to happen… probably this year we’ll start seeing some of it.

LR: So what do you think the upshot of that will be? Will they just suppress it? Is that why they’re bringing the troops home? [see also this article]

GC: Well they’re going to try to, obviously, and there is all this talk about opening up these detention centers and hiring the goon squads – the Blackwaters and the rest of them – to run them. So these are realities that are going on as we speak. And whether they keep saying that they’re opening up these detention centers in the event of migrant problems, but of course it’s much bigger than that. It’s under the Department of Homeland Security, and KBR – the engineering and construction subsidy of Haliburton – have been awarded a half a billion dollar, one year base period, to get these national emergency / national disaster centers up and running. So yeah, it’s in the cards, they know what’s going on. And we’re really in a period of off-with-their-heads. It’s going to be the people against the politicians, the new kings and queens of commerce, as well.

GC: It’s a fight against a totalitarian government. You can call it “communist” when a state-owned monopoly runs everything, or you can call it “fascist” or you can call it “socialist” – but the one thing you cannot call it is “free-market enterprise”. So yeah, there are going to be rebellions, and, you know, things will change for the better if we break up these criminal governments that are in place right now.

US History Textbook: New World Order is Here

Watch the video below to see an American History textbook that teaches the students that the United States is, and has been, a part of the New World Order.